Stay on Top of Recent M&A's with Breaking News Stories

Mergers & Acquisitions on Ulitzer

Subscribe to Mergers & Acquisitions on Ulitzer: eMailAlertsEmail Alerts newslettersWeekly Newsletters
Get Mergers & Acquisitions on Ulitzer: homepageHomepage mobileMobile rssRSS facebookFacebook twitterTwitter linkedinLinkedIn


Mergers & Acquisitions Authors: Pat Romanski, Bob Gourley, Jim Kaskade, David Skok, Liz McMillan

Related Topics: Mergers & Acquisitions on Ulitzer

Mergers & Acquisitions: Article

Oracle Bid for PeopleSoft on Life Support

Oracle Bid for PeopleSoft on Life Support

PeopleSoft said late Tuesday that Justice Department investigators told it that they were going to recommend to antitrust boss Hugh Pate that the agency block Oracle's hostile bid to acquire PeopleSoft. Pate is supposed to make the final decision by March 2.

Oracle brazened it out and claimed it still has a shot. It trotted out one of its lawyers to say that there have been many instances of the Assistant Attorney General bucking his staff.

Oracle spokesman Jim Finn blamed PeopleSoft CEO and ex-Oracle executive Craig Conway.

"The initial proposal to merge PeopleSoft's applications business with Oracle's applications business," Finn's statement said, "came from PeopleSoft CEO Craig Conway, who proposed that he was the best person to run the combined companies' applications business and never mentioned any antitrust concerns. However, when Oracle countered by proposing to buy PeopleSoft, Conway said that he wouldn't sell at any price. He then began a long and intensive lobbying effort aimed at persuading the Antitrust Division of the US Department of Justice to block the deal. PeopleSoft's lobbying resulted in complicating and prolonging the Justice Department review of the merger. While no decision has yet been made, Oracle believes this merger will eventually be approved."

The market thinks Oracle's dreaming. Otherwise everybody appears to be betting that Oracle is going to arm wrestle the Justice Department for the privilege of buying PeopleSoft or take the agency to court.

One might at this point reflect on the fact that Oracle CEO Larry Ellison was one of those to set the antitrust dogs on Microsoft and that he now has to fend one off himself. Conway evidently sold the DOJ investigators on a narrow definition of the market and the chance of higher prices.

Right before the DOJ news, the PeopleSoft board had its usual knee-jerk reaction to Oracle's sweetened offer of $9.4 billion, $26-a-share, and turned it down claiming, as it has before, that it's worth more than that and, anyway, it's anticompetitive.

Barring Pate turning thumbs down and an Oracle retreat, PeopleSoft's unqualified rejection leaves Oracle with its plan to grab control of the PeopleSoft board at the stockholders meeting on March 25. The hurdle after that would be PeopleSoft's poison pill and the growing noise that Oracle is paying way too much.

If it got the company, it would evidently have to pay, maybe, $1.5 billion to cover those refund liabilities PeopleSoft has run up so the real price is more like $11 billion.

According to First Call, Oracle's $26 bid, which Oracle claimed last week was the highest it's willing to go, is in line with what Wall Street on average thinks PeopleSoft will be worth in a year. A few of the more optimistic brokers think it could go to $30, while the pessimistic think it could drop to $17.

Given that PeopleSoft shares haven't moved above $23 since Oracle upped its offer, it's assumed the market figures the deal is dead.

In rejecting Oracle's bid, PeopleSoft claimed that its stock is trading at the low end of its historical value based on forward earnings because of the uncertainty that Oracle has created. With a historical multiple based on its 2004 earnings, PeopleSoft claimed the company's true value "far exceeds the offer price."

"Don't underestimate the significant additional value PeopleSoft can create once the disruption from Oracle's hostile activities has ended," PeopleSoft said in a statement. It didn't venture to say what multiple its conjectures were based on. It did say that it believed Oracle was out to damage PeopleSoft to acquire it at "an unreasonably low price."

Oracle, in turn, defended its price saying, "Given PeopleSoft's uncertain future as a standalone company and the fact that, for the first quarter, PeopleSoft guided analysts below the consensus estimates, Oracle believes that its offer is full and generous." It told PeopleSoft stockholders to think for themselves and tender their shares.

PeopleSoft said its bankers Citigroup Global Markets and Goldman Sachs thought the Oracle offer was "inadequate."

An Oracle deal would be worth something like $200 million to PeopleSoft CEO Craig Conway.

PeopleSoft's stock dropped 2% to $22 and change when the news of PeopleSoft's continued

More Stories By Maureen O'Gara

Maureen O'Gara the most read technology reporter for the past 20 years, is the Cloud Computing and Virtualization News Desk editor of SYS-CON Media. She is the publisher of famous "Billygrams" and the editor-in-chief of "Client/Server News" for more than a decade. One of the most respected technology reporters in the business, Maureen can be reached by email at maureen(at)sys-con.com or paperboy(at)g2news.com, and by phone at 516 759-7025. Twitter: @MaureenOGara

Comments (2) View Comments

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.


Most Recent Comments
t.hickey 02/16/04 02:01:10 AM EST

To lawerence Whitfield, you sound just like the people who think America is too agressive, too arrogant and far too inconsiderate of anybody, and that Sept 11, was just a slap in our face, to wake us up. Do You commend them for what they did? Oracle is following the laws and trying to compete with SAP. There are plenty of vendors out there making ERP software. If oracle eats up Peoplesoft, this will give oracle a chance to compete against SAP and a cahnce for the smaller ERP players to increase their market share.

Lawrence Whitfield 02/14/04 01:42:30 AM EST

It will be good news indeed if this acquisition is blocked - it's time that Oracle was given a firm slap in the face. They are becoming far too big, too aggressive, too arrogant, and far too inconsiderate of what their users and everyone else really want. Anything that knocks them back is to be commended, they need to learn a lesson.